
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Candelaria, Nathaniel P.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Promoting Food Sovereignty in Thailand and the Task of Civil Society</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reimagining Development in Southeast Asia Alternative Practices from the Grassroots and Social Movements</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-9140-8_4</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Springer</style></publisher><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">73-87</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thailand is one of the largest rice exporters in the world, with rice production playing a crucial role in its agricultural sector. However, the current model of industrialized rice production, driven by the Green Revolution, has led to significant challenges, including soil degradation, economic burdens on farmers, and threats to food sovereignty. This chapter examines the limitations of the dominant food security paradigm, which prioritizes food availability and economic access but overlooks cultural and ecological concerns. It highlights how Thai civil society organizations, particularly the Sustainable Agriculture Foundation (SAF), the Alternative Agriculture Foundation (AAF), and BioThai, are advocating for food sovereignty as an alternative framework. Through focus group discussions and case studies, the chapter explores how these organizations build networks, engage in policy advocacy, and promote sustainable agricultural practices. Their efforts emphasize grassroots mobilization, research collaboration, and public education to challenge industrialized agriculture. By reclaiming traditional farming knowledge and fostering solidarity, these movements present a viable path toward an ecologically sustainable and socially just food system in Thailand.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nathaniel Punongbayan Candelaria</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Using Anime in Teaching and Understanding Major International Relations (IR) Theories: A Case Study of How a Realist Hero Rebuilt the Kingdom</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Anime and Manga Studies</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://iopn.library.illinois.edu/journals/jams/article/view/1566</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">51-74</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The literature on Political Science education has already established the use of popular culture in teaching International Relations (IR) theories. However, the same recognition does not extend to anime despite its documented potential as an educational tool in the literature. This paper argues that anime contributes to IR and Political Science literature both as an object of study and as a tool in teaching and understanding major IR theories. Using the case of&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;How a Realist Hero Rebuilt the Kingdom&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(&lt;em&gt;Realist Hero&lt;/em&gt;), this paper demonstrates how major IR theories can also be illustrated through this series. Though earlier analyses of the series focused on realism, this paper builds on those analyses and, at the same time, utilizes other major theories, such as liberalism and constructivism. These three major IR theories were then used to analyze the international politics of the&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Realist Hero&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;series by focusing on the significant events that transpired in the two-season anime series by J.C. Staff, Co., Ltd., as well as the continuation of its story in the light novel format, written by Dojyamaru.&amp;nbsp;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nathaniel Punongbayan Candelaria</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) as an International Agricultural Research Center (IARC): From the Cold War to One CGIAR</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Philippine Journal of Public Policy: Interdisciplinary Development Perspectives</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://cids.up.edu.ph/the-international-rice-research-institute-irri-as-an-international-agricultural-research-center-iarc-from-the-cold-war-to-one-cgiar/</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-38</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper takes a modest step in sketching the history of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) from its Cold War origins to the present. Consolidating different sources to tell this narrative, this paper aims to fill in some gaps in the narrative of IRRI’s development, offer some additional details thereto, and extend it to cover IRRI under One CGIAR. The geopolitical rivalry between the United States of America (thereafter US) and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (thereafter the Soviet Union) during the Cold War helped establish IRRI in the Philippines in 1960. This ushered the Green Revolution. Formed in the crucible of Cold War geopolitics, IRRI then underwent changes after 1991, such as: (1) formal recognition of IRRI as an International Agricultural Research Center (IARC); (2) stability, increase, and eventual decline of public spending in agriculture research post-2014 (Beintema and Echeverria 2020); (3) the post-Cold War involvement of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) in IRRI’s activities (Medina 2020); and (4) the expansion of BMGF’s corporate involvement, which was facilitated through the centralization of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) under One CGIAR. This paper offers some insights on the implications of post-Cold War develpments in IRRI for global food security, arguing what states, scholars, and/or members of civil society can and should do in light of these developments.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>