
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Consuelo Chua</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jose Pedrajita</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kevin Carl Santos</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gender differential item functioning in polytomous items: A comparison of three method</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/0adbde_60cf91e10aef43a9b5770fd97d33b4b4.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">45-67</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The present study compared the consistency of the results of three nonparametric differential item functioning (DIF) techniques – the Cumulative Common Log-Odds Ratio (CCLOR), Standardized Mean Difference (SMD), and the Mantel Test (Mantel) in detecting gender DIF in the Emotional Quotient Scale – College Version. The sample comprised 1,229 college students (male = 657; women= 572) from a state university in the Philippines. The agreement of the DIF methods was determined using classification consistency and matching percentages. Results show that CCLOR and Mantel agreed perfectly in detecting gender DIF items. SMD, on the other hand, had a moderate to high agreement with the two other DIF techniques. The agreement among the DIF methods was lower when DIF effect size was considered.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record></records></xml>